Informal vs. formal assessment:
Informal
assessmentàInformal
assessments are assessments that are not formally conducted in the classroom,
but that are conducted daily and continually through observances of students
regular behaviors. For example, if
I were to assign my high school students vocabulary problems in their
vocabulary workbooks, and if I noticed one student sitting quietly at his desk,
staring at a section in the workbook, I could discern that he or she may be
having trouble understanding the directions for a particular set of problems,
and could therefore offer assistance in helping him or her realize exactly what
they’re supposed to do.
Formal
assessmentàA formal
assessment differs from an informal assessment in that it is announced to the
class days or even weeks before the assessment is given. In my class, I could announce that the
following week we would be having a short, one-page test over the elements of
character, conflict, and plot in fiction.
The students could then study ahead of time, and I would, through the
formal assessment, be able to gauge each student’s understanding of the
elements of fiction I have taught.
Traditional Asessment
vs. Authentic Assessment:
Traditional
AssessmentàAny
paper-pencil assessment I give in my class could be called a traditional
assessment, as the questions addressed and answers are probably questions that
the students would not be asked in real-world experiences. For instance, I could ask my students
to answer fill-in-the-blank questions with a correct vocabulary word from that
specific week. Or, I could ask my
students, during the first week of class, to write a personal essay that they
would turn in to me at the end of class; I could then read these personal
essays and determine which students already have a good grasp on grammatical
principles and writing and which students do
not,
and what specific aspects of writing we should focus on first in the class.
Authentic
AssessmentàAn
authentic assessment is one that takes what concepts and skills students have
learned in class and applies it to real-world situations they may experience
outside of class. As an authentic
assessment, I could require my students to each write a faux-newspaper article
and compiling it with other students’ articles to form one class
newspaper. This authentic
assessment would give the students the opportunity to demonstrate their learned
writing skills, and could inspire students to maybe one day pursue writing as a
career.
Criterion-referenced
assessment vs. Norm-referenced assessment:
Criterion-referenced
assessmentàIn a
criterion-referenced assessment, students are tested on material and concepts
they have learned in class; the point of a criterion-referenced assessment is
to see if students have met predetermined standards or criteria, i.e. if they
have successfully grasped the taught concepts and material which they should,
at this point, be able to understand.
An example of a criterion-referenced assessment I may give in my class
is a paper-pencil test regarding books we have read as a class in order to see
if the students have fully understood who the main characters and plot of the
story are.
Norm-referenced
assessmentàIn a
norm-referenced assessment, students’ test scores are compared to the test
scores of other similarly aged students across the nation. This sort of test is useful in telling
us if a student’s performance is above average, average, or below average than
other students. One example of a
norm-referenced assessment that my high school students may have to take would
be the TCAP writing assessment.
This test takes students’ writing abilities and, I believe, compares
them to how other students their age or in their grade are writing. This sort of norm-referenced assessment
is extremely important to high schoolers because many of them will be writing
application essays to colleges they wish to attend, and if they see that their
writing abilities are average or below average, then they may be motivated to
hone their writing skills in order to better impress college admissions offices
and beat out other applicants.
Standardized test vs.
Teacher-developed test:
Standardized
testàStandardized tests may be the most
commonly used tests in classrooms because each test is the same and students
are asked the same questions, questions that may effectively measure a
student’s performance or ability so far.
I’m sure the vocabulary tests I administer to my students will be
standardized, which is fine because vocabulary questions aren’t that abstract
and can be reliably assessed and graded.
Teacher-developed
testàIn order to assess students’
understanding of specific concepts taught in my class, I would most likely use
a teacher-developed test. A
grammar test dealing with dangling modifiers and comma splices (errors many of
my students make) would have to be teacher-developed. A test over The
Catcher in the Rye and the meanings of its various symbols, symbols that I
may have discussed in-class, may also need to be teacher-developed, because the
writer of a standardized test and I may not agree on an interpretation of one
of the book’s symbols.
Paper-pencil assessment
vs. Performance assessment:
Paper-pencil
assessmentàA
paper-pencil assessment is simply an assessment that is written on paper, and
which students must answer on paper as well. Many of my assessments will probably be paper-pencil
assessments, such as vocabulary quizzes, grammar tests, and tests over assigned
readings. These types of
assessments are important in gauging a student’s understanding of the material,
but they cannot really be performed and must simply be addressed on paper.
Performance
assessmentàIn a
performance assessment, a student demonstrates what they have learned through a
type of performance. I could see
myself asking my students to memorize a poem and recite it in front of the
class. In this way, I can assess
whether or not a student has really gotten engaged with his or her reading,
because if not then they will not be able to recite the poem aloud.
Excellent job at relating each category to your own future lessons as a teacher. I've always enjoyed literature courses and you seem like you have a solid understanding of what each type of assessment is about. Here is a piece of friendly advice: I would change your font on here to make it easier to read. It could just be me but just letting you know.
ReplyDeleteColby,
ReplyDeleteI found interesting your thoughts on teacher-developed assessment. You brought up an interesting point about different interpretations of what should be on the test as compared to what the developer of a standardized test would believe appropriate. Especially with English, books mean different things to different people. A teacher-developed test would allow you to test students on your individual interpretation. I think that subjects such as English are in the very nature not affected as much by standardized testings as say, a math or science class might be.